Welcome back to The Horror Jar, that column where we look at lists from horror movies.
Up today it’s the Hammer Mummy series. Unlike the Hammer Dracula and Frankenstein series which either were direct sequels or at least followed the same characters, Peter Cushing’s Baron Frankenstein, for example, the Hammer Mummy movies told separate stories and were completely independent of each other.
There were four Hammer Mummy movies: THE MUMMY (1959), THE CURSE OF THE MUMMY’S TOMB (1964), THE MUMMY’S SHROUD (1967), and BLOOD FROM THE MUMMY’S TOMB (1971). The best, by far, was the first, THE MUMMY.
THE MUMMY (1959)
THE MUMMY followed upon the heels of Hammer’s first two break-out films, their horror smashes THE CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN (1957) and HORROR OF DRACULA (1958), the two movies which put Hammer on the map. And Hammer’s “A” team returned for THE MUMMY: their top director, Terence Fisher, and their new horror stars, Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee, with Cushing again playing the hero, John Banning, and Lee again playing the monster, Kharis, the Mummy.
Like THE CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN and HORROR OF DRACULA before it, THE MUMMY was once again a reboot of the old Universal monster movies, only this time, THE MUMMY wasn’t a straight remake of one movie, but a bunch of the Universal Mummy movies. It borrowed the title from the original Boris Karloff THE MUMMY (1932) but chose not to use Karloff’s Mummy character, Imhotep. Instead, the Mummy was Kharis, a character originated by Tom Tyler in THE MUMMY’S HAND (1940) and later played by Lon Chaney Jr. in three more Mummy movies.
Peter Cushing’s John Banning and his wife Isobel (Yvonne Furneaux) were characters from THE MUMMY’S TOMB (1942), while John’s father Steve Banning, originated in THE MUMMY’S HAND. But Raymond Huntley’s Uncle Joe Whemple was a character from Karloff’s THE MUMMY. And the character played by George Pastell, Mehemet Bey, the man who controls the Mummy, was a character from THE MUMMY’S TOMB, played by Turhan Bey.
In terms of plot, Hammer’s THE MUMMY most closely follows Universal’s THE MUMMY’S TOMB, although the ending where Kharis makes his way to the swamp, comes from THE MUMMY’S GHOST (1944), which is too bad because THE MUMMY’S TOMB has the most exciting ending of any of the old Mummy movies, and had Hammer chosen to go with this ending, they would have had a more exciting movie.
As it stands, while handsomely photographed, THE MUMMY is simply not as memorable as either THE CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN or HORROR OF DRACULA. The number one reason why? For whatever reason, and I tend to believe it’s because director Terence Fisher always said he didn’t make horror movies, but films that told stories with elements of horror, Fisher chose not to make his movies all that scary. Both THE CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN and HORROR OF DRACULA contain moments on screen which pushed the envelope— the shocking first appearance of Christopher Lee’s Creature in CURSE, or Lee’s Dracula baring his fangs and throwing Jonathan Harker across the room— but THE MUMMY does not.
Peter Cushing is very good as John Banning, but compared to Victor Frankenstein or Dr. Van Helsing, Banning is boring. The best part of THE MUMMY as we look back at it here in 2023, is Christopher Lee’s performance as Kharis, the Mummy. Which is funny because back in the day Lee was dismissed as just an average actor. Which simply isn’t true.
Lee’s strength is he does more with less. In this case, he’s playing a bandaged monster who is mute because his tongue has been cut out, and he does so much with just his eyes in this movie, it’s amazing. The scene where he is told to return to his tomb by Mehemet Bey after having just been revived, and later when he recognizes Isobel as his long-lost love, are two of the most effective scenes in the whole movie, and it’s just Lee doing things with his eyes and body, because he’s bandaged as a Mummy!
All the Mummy scenes in THE MUMMY are exceedingly well done, and Peter Cushing is always fun to watch. One of Cushing’s best scenes is his conversation with Mehemet Bey late in the movie where he’s trying to figure out if Bey really is the man behind the murderous Mummy. It’s a nice bit of cat and mouse conversation that makes for high drama.
THE MUMMY is a very watchable and enjoyable monster movie. It’s just not all that scary.
THE CURSE OF THE MUMMY’S TOMB (1964)
Hammer’s second Mummy movie was THE CURSE OF THE MUMMY’S TOMB, which had nothing to do with their first Mummy movie, THE MUMMY. Written and directed by Michael Carreras, Hammer’s long-time producer and co-founder, THE CURSE OF THE MUMMY’S TOMB is okay. It has a powerful music score by Carlo Martelli, and the make-up used on the Mummy’s face is pretty cool looking— there’s something about it that has always reminded me of Michael Myer’s mask years later in the HALLOWEEN movies. Or maybe it’s just because Carreras included a neat breathing sound effect for the Mummy here, something John Carpenter would do for Michael Myers fourteen years later in the first HALLOWEEN (1978).
But the pot-bellied Mummy in this one is a disappointment. Played by stunt man Dickie Owen, he’s not a very effective Mummy. That being said, Michael Carreras manages to craft a couple of scenes in this one which are far scarier than anything seen in THE MUMMY (1959). The Mummy’s first appearance, for example, on a fog-shrouded outdoor staircase, is arguably the most frighteningly filmed scene in any Mummy movie ever! It’s atmospheric, creepy, and it packs a punch when the Mummy emerges from the fog to unexpectedly kill off a major character. It’s brilliantly shot by Carreras, a man not known for his directorial skills.
And later, when the Mummy crushes another character’s head with his foot, it’s a jolting moment. Both these scenes are examples of the types of scares absent from Terence Fisher’s THE MUMMY.
As stories go, the one told in THE CURSE OF THE MUMMY’S TOMB is average, although it does have a decent twist near the end, but the characters are pretty much all one-dimensional and dull. The best character is showman Alexander King (Fred Clark) who not only welcomes the Mummy’s curse but promotes it, as he uses it to sell tickets to his latest attraction. King is reminiscent of Robert Armstrong’s Carl Denham in KING KONG (1933). It’s a fun performance by the ubiquitous Fred Clark, who was everywhere on TV and in the movies in the 1950s and 1960s. Clark would die four years later in 1968 from a liver ailment. He was only 54.
THE CURSE OF THE MUMMY’S TOMB has its moments, but overall, without the presence of Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee, it’s not as good as Hammer’s first Mummy movie, THE MUMMY.
THE MUMMY’S SHROUD (1967)
THE MUMMY’S SHROUD is probably the weakest of the Hammer Mummy movies. It tells another mediocre story with cardboard characters, and the Mummy here is once again portrayed by a stunt man, this time Eddie Powell. It also has one of the least effective looking Mummies in the movies. There’s just something too neat and tidy looking about him.
The best actor in this one is Andre Morell, and he ends up not being in this one all that much. Morell played Doctor Watson to Peter Cushing’s Sherlock Holmes in Hammer’s THE HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES (1959), and he also starred in THE GIANT BEHEMOTH (1959), a sea monster movie featuring the special effects of King Kong creator Willis H. O’Brien.
Directed by John Gilling, with a screenplay by Gilling and Anthony Hinds, THE MUMMY’S SHROUD is the least interesting of the Hammer Mummy movies, although it does contain a great music score by Don Banks, who also scored Hammer’s THE EVIL OF FRANKENSTEIN (1964).
BLOOD FROM THE MUMMY’S TOMB (1971)
Hammer’s fourth and final Mummy movie, BLOOD FROM THE MUMMY’S TOMB, has a lot going for it. It’s based on a Bram Stoker novel, The Jewel of Seven Stars, it features a female mummy, and it tells a much more intriguing story than its three predecessors. The problem is it fails in its execution. It drops the ball with nearly all these neat elements.
Some of this may have been the result of some bad luck.
Director Seth Holt died from a heart attack during filming, and so the film was completed by Michael Carreras. As a result, the movie seems to lack the vision of a single director. The pacing is off, as is the storytelling, and in spite of some interesting characters, nothing in this movie really resonates all that much.
Peter Cushing was originally cast to play one of the main characters but dropped out to take care of his wife Helen, who was in declining health at the time. Andrew Keir replaced him. Keir is a very good actor, but he doesn’t do a heck of a lot here in this movie.
The most interesting character in the movie is the mysterious Corbeck, played by James Villiers. Mark Edwards plays the young male lead, a character named Tod Browning, an obvious nod to DRACULA (1931) director Tod Browning.
But the worst problem with BLOOD FROM THE MUMMY’S TOMB is that Valerie Leon in the dual lead role as the innocent Margaret and reincarnated murderous mummy Tera just doesn’t make an impact.
BLOOD FROM THE MUMMY’S TOMB has so much potential, which is why I get excited nearly every time I sit down to watch it. Yet, it’s a disappointment because it never achieves what it sets out to do. It’s far more intriguing than THE MUMMY’S SHROUD, but cinematically, doesn’t come close to either THE CURSE OF THE MUMMY’S TOMB or THE MUMMY.
BLOOD FROM THE MUMMY’S TOMB also has the misfortune of being the only Hammer Mummy movie not to feature Hammer favorite, and one of my favorite character actors, Michael Ripper.
With Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee in the cast of THE MUMMY, Hammer’s first foray into Egyptian curses and undying bandaged monsters remains their best.
So, there you have it. A brief look at the Hammer Mummy movies. I hope you will join me again next time on THE HORROR JAR, when we’ll look at another list pertaining to horror movies.
As always, thanks for reading!
—Michael